On Tue, 06 Nov 2018 17:08:22 +0200
Mart Raudsepp <l...@gentoo.org> wrote:

> Ühel kenal päeval, T, 06.11.2018 kell 12:00, kirjutas Alexis Ballier:
> > On Mon, 05 Nov 2018 20:38:58 -0500
> > Craig Andrews <candr...@gentoo.org> wrote:
> >   
> > > I think it's time to remove the mask on >=media-video/ffmpeg-4.0
> > > 
> > > ffmpeg 4 is in many distros (including Debian, Arch) and FreeBSD.
> > > Upstreams are starting to require it, too. For example, Kodi 18
> > > and 
> > > media-plugins/gst-plugins-libav-16 will require it.
> > > 
> > > The blocker issue https://bugs.gentoo.org/653678 has only 5
> > > blockers 
> > > against it right now:
> > > * 654628 has a pull request out to fix it: 
> > > https://github.com/gentoo/gentoo/pull/10341
> > > * 655170 is for a package that (IMHO) should be last-rited: 
> > > media-libs/mediastreamer
> > > * 666166 is for a package that (IMHO) should be last-rited: 
> > > media-plugins/vdr-image
> > > * 655442 and 658128 are for media-video/mplayer and fixed
> > > upstream, 
> > > requiring a new snapshot release
> > > 
> > > What do we say? Can we set a date when the hard mask will be
> > > removed?  
> > 
> > 
> > I think 6 months qualifies for ETIMEOUT, so go ahead and unmask
> > it :)
> > 
> > merge the github PR; I'll take care of mplayer  
> 
> I'm sorry, but what?
> PR was filed yesterday, what 6 months are you talking about here?
> Please respect your fellow developers. We have other commitments and
> priorities and can't zero-day review a PR.


Oh, sorry, I did not even check what the PR was about nor its
uptime. It should definitely read as "get the PR merged" then.

6 months is when bugs started to be filled which by most standards a
package not fixed within that time can be considered dead/unmaintained.
I usually take no response for a couple of months as a green light to
do it myself.


> It is not GStreamer fault that ffmpeg breaks API and ABI without
> parallel installability, much less so the distro maintainers of it.
> If you/upstream don't make it parallel installable, then this is what
> you get.


Are you, seriously, suggesting this is the solution to all problems
here ?

Bests,

Alexis.

Reply via email to