On 02/24/19 04:04, Michał Górny wrote: > On Sat, 2019-02-23 at 22:19 -0800, Matt Turner wrote: >> On Fri, Feb 22, 2019 at 8:30 PM desultory <desult...@gentoo.org> wrote: >>> >>> On 02/20/19 02:36, Michał Górny wrote: >>>> On Wed, 2019-02-20 at 07:20 +0100, Ulrich Mueller wrote: >>>>>>>>>> On Wed, 20 Feb 2019, Matt Turner wrote: >>>>> >>>>> >>>>>> # Don't install libtool archives (even for modules) >>>>>> - prune_libtool_files --all >>>>>> + find "${D}" -name '*.la' -delete || die >>>>> >>>>> Maybe restrict removal to regular files, i.e. add "-type f"? >>>> >>>> I suppose you should have spoken up when people started adopting that >>>> 'find' line all over the place. Though I honestly doubt we're going to >>>> see many packages installing '*.la' non-files. >>>> >>> >>> Just so we are all clear here: your argument is that more fully correct >>> approaches should not be considered in the present and future because >>> less fully correct approaches were implemented in the past? And, >>> further, that since nothing matching a specific pattern happens to come >>> to your mind at he moment, such things do not exist? Perhaps dialing >>> back the rhetoric from 11 and considering feedback as an opportunity to >>> improve existing code is called for in this case, among others. >> >> I think you might be reading more into this than was intended. >> >> I read his email as lamenting that the horse has left the barn, so to >> speak. There are already hundreds of uses of find -name '*.la' -delete >> without -type f in the tree, probably in large part because >> ltprune.eclass suggests the form without it. >> >> Suggesting dialing down the rhetoric when it appears that you have >> overreacted is a bit humorous. >> > > He simply decided to stalk me and issue ad hominem attacks whenever he > can. It's how professionals in Gentoo react to critique. > I am hardly "stalking" you. I am addressing bad ideas and poor maintainer behavior, that it happens to be yours is immaterial to me. Besides, you effectively demanded that I participate more broadly[1], so do kindly pick one sort of libel and stick to it. As contradicting yourself not only weakens your argument (were it to have a basis to begin with), it makes malicious intent more obvious.
As for ad hominem attacks, do kindly present examples, I would be most interested in any which you can demonstrate are unjustified. When I ask if/how/why your behavior is acceptable for someone in your roles, I am seriously asking that question. I want to know the rationale, especially under what are, at least nominally, the rules governing the interactions and behaviors which I am inquiring about. Though I will forego linking to that, as that evidently annoys you. [1] https://archives.gentoo.org/gentoo-project/message/b498bcfaf34ffc355eaba3afafd1ee96