>>>>> On Sat, 13 Apr 2019, Michał Górny wrote: > On Sat, 2019-04-13 at 21:52 +0200, Ulrich Mueller wrote: >> > > > > > On Sat, 13 Apr 2019, Michał Górny wrote: >> > # Michał Górny <[email protected]> (13 Apr 2019) >> > # Unmaintained. Contains vulnerable code and a large number of unsolved >> > # (upstream) issues, including licensing issues that prevented Debian >> > # from including it. >> >> I suppose that is referring to Debian bug 202475? >> https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=202475#61 >> >> If that's the case, it is their usual BS that they consider the FDL to >> be a non-free license. (Basically, netcat.texi contains license texts >> of the GPL and the FDL which by their very nature are "invariant".) >> >> This is not a concern for us. The FDL is approved by the FSF as a free >> documentation license, and therefore it is in our @FREE license group.
> Thanks for clarifying that. I have to admit I didn't really understand > what they meant in that bug report. However, I suppose this doesn't > invalidate the remaining points. Should I update the mask message? Yes, please. Ulrich
signature.asc
Description: PGP signature
