On 24 May 2019 05:59:29 BST, "Michał Górny" <mgo...@gentoo.org> wrote: >On Tue, 2019-04-30 at 07:38 +0200, Michał Górny wrote: >> Hi, >> >> Here's my proposed EAPI 7 support for llvm.eclass. I think it should >> conceptually work with cross but I haven't tested it. The main >problem >> is that we have multiple distinct ways of building LLVM, and AFAIU >> when using CMake modules, you should be able to get away without >having >> LLVM in CBUILD. However, when using llvm-config you obviously need >> it CBUILD-executable. >> >> To support both scenarios, get_llvm_prefix is now provided with '-b' >> and '-d' options (matching those to has_version). Using them, you >can >> choose the behavior suitable for your package. >> >> I've left the default at '-d'. I don't really know which is better >> for the generic cross case but either way should work for non-cross >> setups. >> >> -- >> Best regards, >> Michał Górny >> >> Michał Górny (4): >> llvm.eclass: Remove unnecessary '_rc' from < example >> llvm.eclass: Update examples for newer LLVM versions >> llvm.eclass: Add EAPI 7 API to get_llvm_prefix >> llvm.eclass: Enable EAPI 7 >> >> eclass/llvm.eclass | 65 >+++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++--------- >> 1 file changed, 53 insertions(+), 12 deletions(-) >> > >Merged.
I know you made the necessary change in PMS for SYSROOT to work in pkg_setup but I don't think it's been fixed in Portage yet? -- Sent from my Android device with K-9 Mail. Please excuse my brevity.
