Ühel kenal päeval, P, 11.08.2019 kell 14:53, kirjutas Michał Górny: > On Sun, 2019-08-11 at 14:46 +0300, Mart Raudsepp wrote: > > The USE flag naming feels a bit to be desired by me. > > That's because I don't believe in USE flags having to be named by > > the > > external dep they introduce, but by functionality. USE=magic sounds > > like a USE flag that adds some wizards into your application, > > automagic > > behavior or who knows (until you read the description). > > Not that I have a much better suggestion. USE=auto-mimetypes? > > > > The use of term 'magic' for file type recognition by magic bytes is > well established.
Fair enough. > Standing on your head and trying to invent an > alternative > is not going to help anyone, and only confuse people. Completely uncalled for unfriendly hostile additional sentence.
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part
