Am Montag, 12. August 2019, 23:10:56 CEST schrieb Michael Orlitzky:
> On 8/9/19 3:26 PM, Rolf Eike Beer wrote:
> > + use ssl && epatch "${FILESDIR}"/qmail-smtputf8.patch
>
> EAI doesn't require SSL as far as I know. Is this conditional on the USE
> flag only because the patch won't apply otherwise? (If so, it may be
> worth a comment to that effect.)Yes, it's a problem with the patch, not EAI. But nice that you tell me that I attached the wrong patch. Eike
>From ff7224e595e2c1b5e293a1fc7991e70f68b04669 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001 From: Rolf Eike Beer <e...@sf-mail.de> Date: Wed, 7 Aug 2019 12:08:54 +0200 Subject: [PATCH] qmail.eclass: honor toolchain settings for ar and ranlib Closes: https://bugs.gentoo.org/471436 Signed-off-by: Rolf Eike Beer <e...@sf-mail.de> --- eclass/qmail.eclass | 1 + 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+) diff --git a/eclass/qmail.eclass b/eclass/qmail.eclass index 6ebbff442c..18f685e4db 100644 --- a/eclass/qmail.eclass +++ b/eclass/qmail.eclass @@ -102,6 +102,7 @@ qmail_set_cc() { echo "${cc} ${CFLAGS} ${CPPFLAGS}" > ./conf-cc || die 'Patching conf-cc failed.' echo "${ld} ${LDFLAGS}" > ./conf-ld || die 'Patching conf-ld failed.' + sed -e "s#'ar #'$(tc-getAR) #" -e "s#'ranlib #'$(tc-getRANLIB) #" -i make-makelib.sh } # @FUNCTION: qmail_create_groups -- 2.16.4
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part.
