On Wed, 2019-08-14 at 17:14 -0400, Mike Gilbert wrote: > Closes: https://bugs.gentoo.org/691478 > Signed-off-by: Mike Gilbert <[email protected]> > --- > eclass/acct-user.eclass | 5 +++++ > 1 file changed, 5 insertions(+) > > diff --git a/eclass/acct-user.eclass b/eclass/acct-user.eclass > index 60009643c144..cec5d0506879 100644 > --- a/eclass/acct-user.eclass > +++ b/eclass/acct-user.eclass > @@ -334,6 +334,11 @@ acct-user_pkg_preinst() { > if [[ -z ${ACCT_USER_HOME_OWNER} ]]; then > > ACCT_USER_HOME_OWNER=${ACCT_USER_NAME}:${ACCT_USER_GROUPS[0]} > fi > + # Path might be missing due to INSTALL_MASK, etc. > + # https://bugs.gentoo.org/691478 > + if [[ ! -e "${ED}/${ACCT_USER_HOME#/}" ]]; then > + keepdir "${ACCT_USER_HOME}" > + fi
Doesn't it violate the principle of least surprise if you recreate
the path that user intentionally wanted stripped?
> fowners "${ACCT_USER_HOME_OWNER}" "${ACCT_USER_HOME}"
> fperms "${ACCT_USER_HOME_PERMS}" "${ACCT_USER_HOME}"
> fi
--
Best regards,
Michał Górny
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part
