On Samstag, 12. Oktober 2019 18:02:28 CEST William Hubbs wrote: > On Sat, Oct 12, 2019 at 01:11:49PM +0200, Michał Górny wrote: > > On Sat, 2019-10-12 at 13:00 +0200, David Seifert wrote: > > > * Some distros have not just merged / and /usr, they > > > > > > have also merged /usr/bin and /usr/sbin. By giving > > > users the choice of merging */bin and */sbin, > > > Gentoo follows suit. > > > > What about the scenario when /bin has been merged with /usr/sbin > > and /sbin with /usr/bin? ;-P > > I also don't see the need for something like this. The idea of the /usr > merge is to have all binaries available in one place, and there really > is not a good justification for separating bin from sbin.
Do I read this correctly? USE=-split-usr currently means that /bin, /sbin, / usr/bin and /usr/sbin point to the same directory? If that is not the case, then I agree that users should have the possibility to set it up like this and USE=-split-sbin should be supported. --Dennis
Description: This is a digitally signed message part.