On Sat, 2019-10-26 at 11:14 +0200, Dirkjan Ochtman wrote: > On Sat, Oct 26, 2019, 05:59 Kent Fredric <ken...@gentoo.org> wrote: > > > On Fri, 25 Oct 2019 15:03:39 -0700 > > Georgy Yakovlev <gyakov...@gentoo.org> wrote: > > > > > not used anymore > > > > > > Closes: https://bugs.gentoo.org/695698 > > > Signed-off-by: Georgy Yakovlev <gyakov...@gentoo.org> > > > > Its likely this removal will cause the same kinds of problems faced by > > the recent virtual/pam removal, just its more insidious, as the > > dependency on the virtual is hidden away inside an eclass. > > > > But this still means that anything users have already installed will > > still depend on this, and without --changed-deps=y, it will break > > portage's resolution of anything currently installed using this crate. > > > > You can work-around this by -r1 bumping everything that used this > > eclass .... but this just goes to show why there's policy against > > eclasses changing the dependencies of their consumers without any > > consumer involvement. > > > > In most if not all cases, this is just a build-time dependency. Do we > really have all these problems for build-time only dependencies? >
Yes. Because of --with-bdeps. -- Best regards, Michał Górny
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part
