> > TL;DR: If a QA check is enforced by Portage for a reasonably long time, > > does it constitute policy? Or can it be changed unilaterally by Portage > > team?
> To avoid these sorts of questions in the future, [snip since offtopic] > In this case, whether or not this is "policy" is beside the point. No > one else wants to remove this check ... If that really were the case, we wouldnt have this discussion. And as we all know *any* action by QA will immediately lead to complaints about abuse of QA powers... FTR, yes I consider that these old QA checks embody QA policy. 14 years of it. -- Andreas K. Hüttel [email protected] Gentoo Linux developer (council, toolchain, base-system, perl, libreoffice)
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part.
