On Fri, Dec 6, 2019 at 5:51 AM Alexis Ballier <aball...@gentoo.org> wrote:
>
> On Fri, 6 Dec 2019 04:33:36 -0500
> Tim Harder <radher...@gentoo.org> wrote:
>
> > On 2019-12-06 Fri 04:03, Alexis Ballier wrote:
> > > it's not just like repoman and cvs since repoman commit did push ;)
> > > it will never be perfect but i really like repoman commit to refuse
> > > to even commit if there's something obviously wrong
> >
> > I'm more of the opinion (and am working towards that practicality in
> > terms of runtime speed) that a subset of QA checks should be run as a
> > git hook which would cause push failures on certain classes of bad
> > commits.
>
>
> There should be both. Amending the 23rd commit message because one
> mistyped a semicolon is kind of a PITA.

It is?

git rebase -i HEAD~23

Is that what you think is a pain in the ass, or do you not know about
interactive rebase? :)

Reply via email to