Am Samstag, 4. Januar 2020, 12:25:07 CET schrieb Michael 'veremitz' Everitt:
> On 04/01/20 11:09, Rolf Eike Beer wrote:
> > Am Freitag, 3. Januar 2020, 11:00:14 CET schrieb Rolf Eike Beer:
> >> Am Freitag, 3. Januar 2020, 03:40:35 CET schrieb Aaron Bauman:
> >>> On January 2, 2020 6:35:08 PM EST, Rolf Eike Beer <[email protected]> 
wrote:
> >>>> Am Freitag, 3. Januar 2020, 00:25:06 CET schrieb Mike Pagano:
> >>>>> hppa is making us keep old kernels around [1].  Should the kernel team
> >>>>> be
> >>>>> doing more to get your attention then CC'ing hppa on all of the kernel
> >>>>> STABLEREQ bugs [2]?
> >>>> 
> >>>> I only run vanilla-sources since there are still lot of cache
> >>>> corruption
> >>>> problems in hppa kernels, or whatever makes them flaky.
> >>>> 
> >>>> Linux pioneer 5.4.6-parisc64 #1 SMP Fri Dec 27 10:23:09 CET 2019
> >>>> parisc64
> >>>> PA8800 (Mako) 9000/785/C8000 GNU/Linux
> >>>> Linux voyager 5.4.6-parisc #1 Fri Dec 27 15:46:43 CET 2019 parisc
> >>>> PA8600
> >>>> (PCX-W+) 9000/785/C3600 GNU/Linux
> >>>> 
> >>>> So _I_ personally would say just drop old kernels, but that is in no
> >>>> way
> >>>> authorative.
> >>> 
> >>> Ugh. gentoo-sources is just a patch (trivial) on top of vanilla-kernel
> >>> sources of each stable and LTS version.
> >> 
> >> If it's just that I could test them, but this still be no LTS version
> >> that I would look at.
> > 
> > So, do you want me to stable a random gentoo-sources (usually the most
> > recent one) every few weeks when I just happen to upgrade my machine?

> I don't think that works very well with kernel/security-team stabilisation
> policies, sadly.
> 
> Is there any possibility you would be able to do a stabilisation run, and
> do a reboot cycle on one LTS branch (of choice, eg. most recent) and then
> revert to your preferred kernel afterwards?

This is annoying, because it usually collides with the nightly runs in some 
way. Doing the build on the C3600 took ~1d last time, the C8000 is faster, but 
I still have to time this right.

Eike

Attachment: signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part.

Reply via email to