On 1/19/20 8:20 PM, Rich Freeman wrote: > It would be far simpler for the sysadmin to simply ensure that no > unsynced user owns a file or appears in an ACL. That would be pretty > trivial to achieve. Whatever is hosting /home could be designed to > block such changes, or you could just scan for these ownership issues > periodically and treat those responsible for them appropriately.
Fantasy scenarios again. I'm not going to debunk a system that you just thought up and that has never existed. Why don't you find one person who actually does this, and see if it bothers him if we create a home directory under /home where it belongs? > On the topic of treating those responsible appropriately, somehow I > could see this scenario turning into a quiz question. > > I mean, would it kill you to just talk to QA first? I've already got responses from two QA members. This thread is pretty hard to miss. I'm working on a patch for the install-qa-check.d check and I'm sure I'll get more when I post it.
