On Wed, 26 Feb 2020 11:23:49 +0100 Michał Górny <mgo...@gentoo.org> wrote:
> Introduce a new configuration file for assigning QA check significance > levels to PGnnnn policies. Long-term goal is that this will permit > unified configuration of various QA tools, including pkgcheck, repoman > and install-qa-check.d. > > Signed-off-by: Michał Górny <mgo...@gentoo.org> > --- > metadata/policy.conf | 61 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++ > 1 file changed, 61 insertions(+) > create mode 100644 metadata/policy.conf > > diff --git a/metadata/policy.conf b/metadata/policy.conf > new file mode 100644 > index 000000000000..824598063cc1 > --- /dev/null > +++ b/metadata/policy.conf > @@ -0,0 +1,61 @@ > +# Copyright 2020 Gentoo Authors > +# Distributed under the terms of the GNU General Public License v2 > + > +# The policy section assigns significance levels to various policies. > +# Keys are identifiers from the Policy Guide, values are either > +# 'notice', 'warninging' or 'error'. extra ing here > +# > +# The rule of thumb is that 'error' indicates a serious problem that > +# may cause serious problem to the end users and therefore should block > +# committing / deployment. 'Warning' should be fixed by developer capital W probably should be w > +# but does not need to immediately prevent committing. > +# > +# https://projects.gentoo.org/qa/policy-guide/std-policy-index.html > + Looks really interesting. Will overlays be able to define their own policy ? Maybe rename file to metadata/qa-policy.conf ? just policy.conf is ambiguous. -- Georgy Yakovlev <gyakov...@gentoo.org>