On 07/03/2020 19.27, Ulrich Mueller wrote:
>>>>>> On Sat, 07 Mar 2020, Michał Górny wrote:
>>> Just the ebuild being outdated doesn't sound like a sufficient reason
>>> for removal of a package, at least not for those packages that install
>>> applications for the end user.
>> The list is almost exclusively about dev-python/, i.e. packages that
>> do not install end-user applications but Python modules.
> Like www-apps/nikola, for example?

Nikola is actively maintained and was recently updated.
It works fine and has many users.

Did you look into that package before hard masking?
I see no problems with this package.

Please undo the masking of fully working packages.


Attachment: signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature

Reply via email to