On Fri, 2020-04-10 at 13:37 +0300, Andreas K. Hüttel wrote: > Am Freitag, 10. April 2020, 09:58:37 EEST schrieb Michał Górny: > > 1. 'Broken' status was removed, as it is redundant to profile status. > > > > 2. State names were changed from 'testing' and 'unstable' to 'degraded' > > (broken stable tree) and 'testing' (pure ~arch) to avoid confusion. > > > > Back in time there was also the idea to use this file to indicate security > support of an arch. The suggestion was to introduce another column, but I > found that rather horrible. > > So a better idea would be to introduce an additional status "security", > designating "stable with security support". > > (Acts in every other respect exactly like "stable".) > > What do you think?
I suppose it'd work for me. I'm not sure if we have any use case for having this data machine-readable but I guess there's no harm in it, and better add it now than adjust tools later. -- Best regards, Michał Górny
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part
