On Sat, 2020-05-23 at 09:54 +0200, Fabian Groffen wrote: > On 22-05-2020 21:58:54 +0200, Michał Górny wrote: > > Let's put it like this. This thing starts working. Package X is > > broken, and we see that almost nobody is using it. We remove that > > package. Now somebody is angry. He submits a lot of fake data to > > render the service useless so that we don't make any future decisions > > based on it. > > I'm affraid that has a heroic flair to me. The service should never be > used for decisions like that, because it's a biased sample at most. > Doing stuff like this simply destroys the soul of the distribution. > > I hope this isn't one of your genuine objectives with the service. If > it is, I can see why you fear spam so much. >
What it is is one thing, what an angry user perceives it to be is another. -- Best regards, Michał Górny
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part
