On Sat, Jun 20, 2020 at 01:29:46PM +0200, Thomas Deutschmann wrote:
> On 2020-06-20 12:07, Michał Górny wrote:
> >> Al least, python2  is not on your list.
> >>
> >> Be first into the future by masking this stuff and
> >> Last out of the past by leaving up to users to decide.
> >> It could stay in the tree, masked, as long as python2.
> >>
> > 
> > Do you really think it'd be better to last rite a 1000 packages
> > simultaneously?
> What's the purpose of this at all?
> dev-lang/python:2.7 won't go away that soon.
> Removing perfectly working and up-to-date software which is in
> maintenance-only mode like net-mail/offlineimap is just not user-friendly.
> It doesn't even has deps on other Python packages blocking your cleanup
> delusion.

Thomas, unfortunately, I am shocked at your choice of words here. I
think it is reasonable that any developer would understand a lack
of forward momentum in removing Py2 only packages only drives

If you have a more effective method to doing so, I am open to

re: net-mail/offlineimap... there are alternatives.


Attachment: signature.asc
Description: PGP signature

Reply via email to