On Mon, 3 Aug 2020 22:23:44 +0000 Peter Stuge <[email protected]> wrote:
> Jimi Huotari wrote: > > # Jimi Huotari <[email protected]> (2020-08-04) > > # No consumers since 2015, and no known stand-alone use. > > # Removal in 30 days. > > dev-libs/liboobs > > Wut - isn't that a really poor reason to remove from the tree? :\ > > Why not just keep it unless there is an actual technical problem? > (Security, maintainability, etc.) If there is, then please mention it. > > > //Peter > I'd certainly be fine with this, and 'app-admin/system-tools-backends', which is next on my list to go, to be assigned to maintainer-wanted instead of being removed. I've sort of inherited these, but have no use for them, and nothing else depends on them. The mask is not live yet, so any advice how to move along will be appreciated. :] See also: - https://bugs.gentoo.org/542846 - https://bugs.gentoo.org/667654 - https://github.com/gentoo/gentoo/pull/16989
pgpuITH_3yTqd.pgp
Description: OpenPGP digital signature
