On 8/11/20 11:36 AM, Jaco Kroon wrote: > And I've already provided you one use case where udev doesn't work well > but eudev does. I've also mentioned some historic issues I believe > should already be fixed but which did bit me in systemd-udev which was > never a problem in eudev. > Your systems seem to diverge a lot from what I'd consider as 'default'. You must already make many changes to them.
Before this thread I didn't even know/remember I was using eudev. It works and there doesn't seem to be any global issues related to it. However after reading this thread I'm a bit considered about the maintenance state of it. Switched to udev. Simple as 'emerge -1 sys-fs/udev'. It works, didn't notice any difference. If musl is a problem, to my knowledge musl has its own stage images, so why can't those stages use eudev while other ones defaulting to udev? -- juippis
Description: OpenPGP digital signature