On Thu, 2021-06-17 at 12:10 +0200, Ulrich Mueller wrote:
> > > > > > On Thu, 17 Jun 2021, David Michael wrote:
>
> > @@ -33,15 +34,12 @@ _FCAPS_ECLASS=1
> >
> > IUSE="+filecaps"
> >
> > -# Since it is needed in pkg_postinst() it must be in RDEPEND
> > +# Since it is needed in pkg_postinst() it must be in IDEPEND
> > case "${EAPI:-0}" in
> > - [0-6])
> > - RDEPEND="filecaps? ( sys-libs/libcap )"
> > - ;;
> > - *)
> > - BDEPEND="filecaps? ( sys-libs/libcap )"
> > - RDEPEND="${BDEPEND}"
> > - ;;
> > + 7) BDEPEND="filecaps? ( sys-libs/libcap )" ;&
>
> This is ill-defined in old EAPIs (5 and before), so the case statement
> may fail. You cannot use ;& in global scope of an eclass.
>
> Why not just change * to 7, and add a new case for 8? It's one
> additional line, and IMHO would be better readable than having a
> fallthrough.
I've already left a comment on the PR suggesting to split it into two
cases: one to check for valid EAPI, the other for deps. It would be
cleaner IMO, as the second case would cover all future EAPIs via *,
and the first one would prevent the syntax error from applying to old
EAPIs (I've tested that).
--
Best regards,
Michał Górny
