On Sun, 2021-10-03 at 12:30 +0200, Ulrich Mueller wrote: > > > > > > On Sun, 03 Oct 2021, Robin H Johnson wrote: > > > If they are not, I think it would be reasonable to consider removing > > CVS from the tree on 2022/01/01. > > I disagree. It is still useful as a package even if it hadn't any > reverse dependencies. For example, it is needed when doing conversions > of historical CVS repositories. > > Also projects still use it; OpenBSD may be the most prominent example. > > Ulrich
Those use cases don't necessitate keeping the eclass though?
