>>>>> On Tue, 05 Oct 2021, Michał Górny wrote:

> On Tue, 2021-10-05 at 19:27 +0100, Sam James wrote:
>> This is a preliminary version/draft of a proposed change to
>> GLEP 68.
>> 
>> I'd like to introduce a method for developers to signal anything
>> special about a package and how to correctly maintain it.
>> 
>> Sam James (1):
>> glep-0068: Add notes element for package maintenance instructions
>> 
>> glep-0068.rst | 26 +++++++++++++++++++++++---
>> 1 file changed, 23 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-)

> To be honest, I don't think adding it to metadata.xml is a good idea. 
> This is not something that's going to be machine-parseable,
> and expecting people to look into metadata.xml to see if it's even
> present is a bit much.

The same argument would apply to longdescription.

> Maybe we could just add README files to the package directories
> in question.  This would have the clear advantage that the files will be
> immediately visible.

Scattering a package's metadata across multiple files doesn't look like
a good idea to me.

Ulrich

Attachment: signature.asc
Description: PGP signature

Reply via email to