On Sat, Feb 26, 2022 at 11:55:10AM -0600, William Hubbs wrote: > If I change the instructions as you suggest to re-package upstream's > tarball the name wouldn't need the -vendor suffix since the tarball would be a > fork, but I'm not asking people to fork and repackage upstream's tarballs, > just > the vendor folder. Fortunately, there is no reason to fork since it is very > easy to package the vendor folder with Go's tools.
Doing:
tar ... project-1.0-vendor.tar.xz project-1.0/vendor
would only package the "vendor" directory and not the whole
project directory. Then when auto-unpacked by src_unpack, the
vendor directory is added under project-1.0/
So this isn't repacking upstream's or a fork.
--
ionen
signature.asc
Description: PGP signature
