>>>>> On Fri, 13 May 2022, Michael Orlitzky wrote: >> So, should we join the "which hunt", with the goal of removing >> sys-apps/which from the system set and from stage1?
> Yes, although I would suggest "command -v" as a POSIX replacement that > can be sent upstream. The "type" utility is also standard, but the "-p" > flag is not, so "type -p" creates some pointless bashisms. This depends on context. I think with bash "type -p" is the better choice, because it simply prints the path which is machine readable without any postprocessing. In other posixly-correct contexts "command -v" may be the best alternative available, indeed. > Both are built-in to bash so there's no performance penalty in ebuilds > either way.
signature.asc
Description: PGP signature
