Am 11.07.22 um 20:14 schrieb Mike Gilbert:
On Mon, Jul 11, 2022 at 1:57 PM Ulrich Mueller <u...@gentoo.org> wrote:On Mon, 11 Jul 2022, Mike Gilbert wrote:Maybe leave ebegin/eend in place then, which was invented precisely for this use case? What's so bad about nesting it?It leads to odd looking output.https://gitweb.gentoo.org/proj/portage.git/commit/?id=eba088af8f335c0adb386461e6df1267e24800e7IIUC it would look like this, with the patch applied: * task 1 * Doing task 2 ... [ ok ] * task 1 succeeded That's not the most beautiful of outputs either.Right. I would prefer to apply the first patch I submitted instead.
How about output like: * Doing task 1 ... | * Doing task 2 ... | \> [ ok ] | | additional log from task 1 | line 2 of task 1 log \> [ !! ]This would require keeping track of the current "indentation" level/prepend "| " to each output for every level. But not sure if is possible/how difficult it is to implement. Just sort of a quick idea.
OpenPGP_signature
Description: OpenPGP digital signature
