> How would you suggest we track who has commit access, etc? The same
> way we do with developers, via a developer bug?

I believe proxy maintainers already have a bug assigned to them (at
least I have one), so maybe just a comment or a special tag would be
suffient on these bugs to signify commit access.
> I ask because I've noticed a lot of inactive proxied maintainers—one
> of which had been listed in metadata.xml for 6 years but had never
> committed to ::gentoo.

Should these packages not be dropped to maintainer needed? Just like
regular developers, wouldn't it be reasonable to expect a minimal level of
activiy from proxied maintainers (even if not as strict) or otherwise be
dropped from a package?


Reply via email to