>>>>> On Fri, 21 Oct 2022, Robin H Johnson wrote: >> So far we had followed the principle not to list authors in the >> acknowledgements (which is worded "the authors would like to thank"). >> If we start adding them for revision 1.2, then we'd have to add more >> names to the existing list.
> How's the clarification now, making it clear those are the authors for > version 1.2? I'd still prefer a single list of acknowledgements in alphabetical order, without any of the authors included. (But I don't have a strong opinion, so if you absolutely want to have a separate paragraph for 1.2, then go ahead.) However, can we please keep the authors list (in the header) as-is? If we're now going to include people for adding a single sentence or suggestion, then we'd also have to list several (all?) of the persons who are listed in the original acknowledgements. >> Another small point: Whitespace in the new section doesn't follow the >> style in the rest of the GLEP, which uses two blank lines before and one >> blank line after section headings, as well as two spaces at the end of >> every sentence. (This is also what GLEP 2 says.) > Fixed - the blank lines were inconsistent in multiple places, but the > two spaces were correct. There shouldn't be double blank lines _after_ section headings (i.e. only a single blank line after "Specification" and "Rationale") . Ulrich  https://www.gentoo.org/glep/glep-0002.html#id15
Description: PGP signature