On Sonntag, 26. Dezember 2021 11:10:45 CEST John Johnson wrote: > On Sat, Dec 25, 2021, 5:19 AM Marek Szuba <mare...@gentoo.org> wrote: > > On 24 December 2021 08:48:08 UTC, Pacho Ramos <pa...@gentoo.org> wrote: > > >> > I think “secret” may be too generic and “libsecret” is not ideal in > > >> > case an implemention comes along that is named differently. How about > > >> > “secret-service”? > > >> > > >> I think this is a good idea. > > > > > >And "keyring"? I am not sure if users not familiar with "libsecret" will > > >understand what "secret*" means in this context > > > > Definitely a good idea. And I second "keyring", seeing as this term is > > also in use on other OSes. > > > > -- > > Marecki > > "keyring" conveys the appropriate meaning, imho. >
It seems that keyring won the popular vote. There is now a bug and a PR: https://bugs.gentoo.org/905928 https://github.com/gentoo/gentoo/pull/31035
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part.
