orbea <or...@riseup.net> writes:
> On Mon, 11 Sep 2023 19:18:45 +0100 > Sam James <s...@gentoo.org> wrote: > >> orbea <or...@riseup.net> writes: >> >> > Hi, >> > >> > Several months ago I made this issue for keywording the >> > games-emulation/jgemu meta package which is a collection of minimal >> > emulators for the command-line games-emulation/jgrf frontend with a >> > focus on accuracy. >> > >> >> You've not populated the package list and no arches are CC'd, but we >> don't keyword things for no reason either on (very) niche arches. >> >> Please select a reasonable set of architectures. >> >> > https://bugs.gentoo.org/891201 >> >> > > Apologies, I wasn't aware I needed to do that and in retrospect I > should of thought of it. Just to be clear you mean add an issue for > each issue and then use them as blockers for the games-emulation/jgemu > issue? No, one bug is okay if you populate the package list field in Bugzilla. Just keep in mind that keywording isn't the same as upstreaam CI either and we generally want to only keyword on arches where someone is likely to use it.
