flammie     05/11/08 12:41:58

  Modified:    xml/htdocs/doc/en gnupg-user.xml
  Log:
  s/encript/encrypt/g, English spelling fix, thanks to RiverRat for reporting
  NO CONTENT CHANGE

Revision  Changes    Path
1.30      +5 -5      xml/htdocs/doc/en/gnupg-user.xml

file : 
http://www.gentoo.org/cgi-bin/viewcvs.cgi/xml/htdocs/doc/en/gnupg-user.xml?rev=1.30&content-type=text/x-cvsweb-markup&cvsroot=gentoo
plain: 
http://www.gentoo.org/cgi-bin/viewcvs.cgi/xml/htdocs/doc/en/gnupg-user.xml?rev=1.30&content-type=text/plain&cvsroot=gentoo
diff : 
http://www.gentoo.org/cgi-bin/viewcvs.cgi/xml/htdocs/doc/en/gnupg-user.xml.diff?r1=1.29&r2=1.30&cvsroot=gentoo

Index: gnupg-user.xml
===================================================================
RCS file: /var/cvsroot/gentoo/xml/htdocs/doc/en/gnupg-user.xml,v
retrieving revision 1.29
retrieving revision 1.30
diff -u -r1.29 -r1.30
--- gnupg-user.xml      13 Oct 2005 20:15:23 -0000      1.29
+++ gnupg-user.xml      8 Nov 2005 12:41:58 -0000       1.30
@@ -1,7 +1,7 @@
 <?xml version='1.0' encoding="UTF-8"?>
 <!DOCTYPE guide SYSTEM "/dtd/guide.dtd">
 
-<!-- $Header: /var/cvsroot/gentoo/xml/htdocs/doc/en/gnupg-user.xml,v 1.29 
2005/10/13 20:15:23 jkt Exp $ -->
+<!-- $Header: /var/cvsroot/gentoo/xml/htdocs/doc/en/gnupg-user.xml,v 1.30 
2005/11/08 12:41:58 flammie Exp $ -->
 
 <guide link = "/doc/en/gnupg-user.xml">
 <title>GnuPG Gentoo user guide</title>
@@ -605,15 +605,15 @@
 <body>
 
 <p>
-95% of the time you will use GnuPG with email, signing/encripting your outgoing
-messages and reading signed/encripted messages. So it is only fair that i talk
+95% of the time you will use GnuPG with email, signing/encrypting your outgoing
+messages and reading signed/encrypted messages. So it is only fair that i talk
 about that first.
 </p>
 
 <p>
-There are two ways two sign/encript a email with GnuPG, the old way and the new
+There are two ways two sign/encrypt a email with GnuPG, the old way and the new
 way :). In the old way messages would appear in plain text, with no possible
-formatting and attached files would be unsigned/unencripted, here is an example
+formatting and attached files would be unsigned/unencrypted, here is an example
 of a message signed the old way:
 </p>
 



-- 
[email protected] mailing list

Reply via email to