neysx       09/10/19 16:16:36

  Modified:             gcc-optimization.xml
  Log:
  #289741 mention -pipe uses more memory

Revision  Changes    Path
1.17                 xml/htdocs/doc/en/gcc-optimization.xml

file : 
http://sources.gentoo.org/viewcvs.py/gentoo/xml/htdocs/doc/en/gcc-optimization.xml?rev=1.17&view=markup
plain: 
http://sources.gentoo.org/viewcvs.py/gentoo/xml/htdocs/doc/en/gcc-optimization.xml?rev=1.17&content-type=text/plain
diff : 
http://sources.gentoo.org/viewcvs.py/gentoo/xml/htdocs/doc/en/gcc-optimization.xml?r1=1.16&r2=1.17

Index: gcc-optimization.xml
===================================================================
RCS file: /var/cvsroot/gentoo/xml/htdocs/doc/en/gcc-optimization.xml,v
retrieving revision 1.16
retrieving revision 1.17
diff -u -r1.16 -r1.17
--- gcc-optimization.xml        19 Jul 2009 02:05:08 -0000      1.16
+++ gcc-optimization.xml        19 Oct 2009 16:16:36 -0000      1.17
@@ -1,6 +1,6 @@
 <?xml version='1.0' encoding='UTF-8'?>
 <!DOCTYPE guide SYSTEM "/dtd/guide.dtd">
-<!-- $Header: /var/cvsroot/gentoo/xml/htdocs/doc/en/gcc-optimization.xml,v 
1.16 2009/07/19 02:05:08 nightmorph Exp $ -->
+<!-- $Header: /var/cvsroot/gentoo/xml/htdocs/doc/en/gcc-optimization.xml,v 
1.17 2009/10/19 16:16:36 neysx Exp $ -->
 
 <guide link="/doc/en/gcc-optimization.xml">
 <title>Compilation Optimization Guide</title>
@@ -19,8 +19,8 @@
 <!-- See http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/2.5 -->
 <license/>
 
-<version>1.11</version>
-<date>2009-07-18</date>
+<version>1.12</version>
+<date>2009-10-19</date>
 
 <chapter>
 <title>Introduction</title>
@@ -340,10 +340,11 @@
 <body>
 
 <p>
-A fun, safe flag to use is <c>-pipe</c>. This flag actually has no effect on 
the
+A common flag is <c>-pipe</c>. This flag actually has no effect on the
 generated code, but it makes the compilation process faster. It tells the
 compiler to use pipes instead of temporary files during the different stages of
-compilation.
+compilation, which uses more memory. On systems with low memory, gcc might get
+killed. In that case, do not use this flag.
 </p>
 
 </body>




Reply via email to