On Wed, 2005-06-01 at 18:27 -0400, Ren� Rh�aume wrote: > > Still probably no harm in having a minimalistic perl around in the > > portage tree. We just cant promote such ideas and being any part of > > proper embedded solutions due to file size and memory/cpu consumption > > that goes along with using perl itself. > Exactly, I would like a minimalistic Perl, not pushing Perl into > embedded systems really. I just thought embedded projects like cutting > the fat. Sorry for the inconvenience my wording caused. As miniperl > means trouble, I will try the perl-base way.
You should file a bug at bugs.gentoo.org for [EMAIL PROTECTED] when you have ebuild patches ready to go. You will probably want to key this functionality on the minimal USE flag perhaps. -- Ned Ludd <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> -- [email protected] mailing list
