On tir, 2005-12-27 at 13:02 -0500, solar wrote: > On Tue, 2005-12-27 at 14:36 +0100, Natanael Copa wrote: > > There were some kind of conflict some time ago related to NLS in > > glibc-2. It resulted in glibc-2 got masked. > > You mean glib2 vs glibc?
ofcourse (sorry) > > > Anyone who know the status of glibc-2 in embedded? > > Assuming you mean glib2 it still remains at the same state. > This is a sore spot for some of us being that the only problem > moving forward is coming from another Gentoo developer. I had the feeling that this is not a technical problem. (from the bugzilla) It would be nice if it could be worked out. > > Are the problems solved in uclibc-0.9.28? > > Yes & No. > .28 has better support and could probably handle it. > ie built in iconv() handling and basic locales handling. > It's just not very ideal or mature at all. -- Natanael Copa -- [email protected] mailing list
