On Fri, 2006-07-14 at 22:40 -0400, Mike Frysinger wrote: > On Friday 14 July 2006 04:28, Ned Ludd wrote: > > On Thu, 2006-07-13 at 23:34 -0400, Mike Frysinger wrote: > > > On Thursday 13 July 2006 04:06, r1 wrote: > > > > I'm trying to subscribe to the gentoo-arm mailing list but the mail > > > > could not be delivered. Is this mailing list alive ? > > > > > > no, i had it killed > > > > > > > or Does an > > > > new/alternative mailing list talking about arm exist ? > > > > > > your e-mailing the new list now > > > > Can you please add the list back. > > no, it rarely got traffic > > > This list should not be dealing with native compiles of glibc. > > i dont see why not ... Gentoo embedded is for embedded processors ... so > while > we highly encourage uClibc, i dont see why we should cock block glibc
It's not a matter of intentional cock blocking it's more a matter of what we (embedded) are agreeing to support. Native glibc compiles fall under the realm of normal gentoo. > -mike -- Ned Ludd <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Gentoo Linux -- Ned Ludd <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Gentoo Linux -- [email protected] mailing list
