On Fri, 2006-09-22 at 23:42 -0400, Mike Frysinger wrote: > On Friday 22 September 2006 20:15, Natanael Copa wrote: > > The biggest differences is the debian style /etc/network/interfaces (I > > use busybox stuff rather than trying to port the zillions gentoo > > gawk/bash specifics) > > i wouldnt bother with the Gentoo network stuff from baselayout ...what we > have > is very powerful, dont get me wrong ... it's just that if you're size > conscious, then your target hardware is probably going to have a very static > network setup which means you can just hand write the friggin stuff and be > done
Then I think alpine-baselayout would be perfect for gentoo-embedded. It uses busybox heavily (mdev instead of udev etc). I can submit an ebuild to bugzilla (on monday) btw... We are building a webconf to alpine, using haser/lua. Since most configfiles are gentoo configs, it will probably work on gentoo-embedded too. > -mike -- [email protected] mailing list
