On Tuesday 19 December 2006 10:49, Janusz Syrytczyk wrote: > On Tuesday 19 December 2006 10:06, José Alberto Suárez López wrote: > > So is not an easy solution right now. If you have a nice idea send my a > > patch for gnap. > > Thanks! > > For me the most vital option is connlimit and ipset as I cannot create > solid rock router without it. > > I expected gnap would solve this issue as it was designed for devices like > routers. A very neat idea is to have a kernel with path-o-matic already > applied in Portage :-) And I guess it doesn't have to be in general Portage > but only in limited gnap Portage (although it would limit the audience). > > The open question is if there is a poor soul to maintain such ongoing task > :-] For work I'm keeping GNAP scripts and a small portage tree reasonably up to date. I plan on making it available sometime soon. However I haven't had the need to patch the kernel yet.
-- Sune Kloppenborg Jeppesen (Jaervosz)
pgp9uM643ZY1y.pgp
Description: PGP signature
