Christopher Friedt wrote:
> Sorry, wrong list :)
> 
> Christopher Friedt wrote:

>> Hi TS guys,
>>
>> Would you be willing to host a public Wiki & portage overlay? I've
>> been using portage for quite some time and now I can say that it's
>> starting to be quite easy to just 'emerge' packages for the TS boards.


If TS or Gentoo is not willing to, I'd be willing to host a moderately
small website, until a larger (bandwidth) drop cold be found.

I have a single static IP and cable modem access 5M down 800k up, so
we'd have to keep the design conservative on bandwidth.


>> I would definitely be willing to write the draft howto's to help
>> everyone else get started who was interested. And I would certainly be
>> willing to contribute any ebuilds and patches that I've already come
>> across.


Well I'd be willing to test your work on a TS-7260. I already have a
TS-5500 and have not pursued these boards any further, due to
a lack of 2.6 kernel support (and access to the JTAG port).

>> Aside from building various kernels, modules, etc, what I've done so
>> far is:
>>
>> rebuild glibc userlands from scratch
>> rebuild uclibc userlands from scratch
>> (using the 2.6 linux kernel headers for compilation)
>>
>> created patches (mainly for +minimal installs) and corresponding ebuilds
>>
>> set up several preference files in /etc, like
>> /etc/portage/package.{use,mask,unmask} and also savedconfigs for
>> uclibc and busybox.
>>
>> The packages that I've emerged with all of my work range from basic
>> things like busybox and zlib to jamvm, gnu-classpath, ftp-servers, and
>> even custom software.
>>
>> After some level of stability has been reached, it's quite likely that
>> the gentoo people would host all of the howto documentation and even
>> merge some of the ebuild modifications into their own trees.

If you do not find satisfaction with TS or gentoo-embedded, drop me
some private email.

James


>>
>>
>> Does that sound like something TS would be willing to put up?
>>
>>
>> Cheers,
>>
>> ~/Chris

-- 
[EMAIL PROTECTED] mailing list

Reply via email to