On Tue, 2007-07-10 at 14:42 -0700, Ned Ludd wrote: > FYI.. 0.9.29 breaks things (which is why that bug is being ignored). > I'm sure you have seen the uClibc list plenty or have become aware of > the threading problems and half complete weak alias handling.
I'm bumping into issue after issue that is supposed to be fixed in 0.9.29. I'm curious how the roadmap is. Should we try to fix 0.9.29 and get an 0.9.29.x into portage or should we "wait" for 0.9.30? Should we try to backport stuff to 0.9.28? Might be I could give a hand but I don't know where I should invest my time. Natanael Copa -- [EMAIL PROTECTED] mailing list
