On the other other hand they need to sell this outdated router somehow, so why not to add a "feature"?
On Tuesday 31 July 2007 15:52:55 Philippe Clérié wrote: > On Tuesday 31 July 2007 08:40:47 Peter Stuge wrote: > > On Tue, Jul 31, 2007 at 03:41:58PM +0300, Kfir Lavi wrote: > > > > > I just found out that Netgear is offering the KWGR614 as an > > > > > Open Source Router. > > > > > > > > I guess they learned something from their competitors, who were > > > > sued and lost. > > > > > > Which they are? ... > > > > On Tue, Jul 31, 2007 at 07:50:39AM -0500, Philippe Clérié wrote: > > > I don't know about that. The Linksys router was _hacked_. > > > > http://gpl-violations.org/news/20060922-dlink-judgement_frankfurt.html > > Well! Yes, I was aware of the story. Which doesn't really change my > opinion. On the other hand, if you're correct, then at least they learn > from other people mistakes. Which is actually quite impressive, since most > people, much less entire companies, don't even learn from their own > mistakes. > > Cheerio! > > -- > > > Philippe > > ------ > The trouble with common sense is that it is so uncommon. > <Anonymous> -- Best, gfdsa
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part.
