Natanael Copa schrieb: > On Sun, 2007-10-14 at 15:44 +0200, Marc Blumentritt wrote: >>> clock: There is the following message: >>> /sbin/hwclock: unrecognized option '--noadjfile' >> This is done by setting of /etc/TZ, so clock is not needed in my setup. > > This should be fixed in busybox. IIRC its fairly simple.
I'm not a dev, so I have no clue how best to fix this. > >>> -> busybox problem or other configuration of clock is required. >>> >>> localmount: there is just thise message: >>> Segmentation fault >>> I don't know, where this comes from. Further investigation is required. >>> >>> keymap and consolefont: >>> /lib/rcscripts/sh/runscript.sh: line 91:kbd_mode: not found >>> /bin/loadkeys not found >> I will do this with a small script and busybox tools, so these two >> scripts are not needed anymore, too. > > I use loadkmap from busybox. It would actually be neat if baselayout-2 > supported native loadkmap as a fallback. I plan to use loadkmap from bb, too. And if baselayout-2 would support this, it would be great. > > > Have a look at https://bugs.gentoo.org/show_bug.cgi?id=175179 for a > patch and info on how to generate the bb kmaps. Why not using dumpkmap from bb? > >>> net.eth0: I want to use udhcpc from busybox (set modules="udhcpc" in >>> net), but I get the following error: >>> /sbin/udhcpc: unrecognized option '--env' >>> >>> -> busybox problem or other configuration of net is required. >> Still a problem. Would be cool, if either baselayout-2 supports >> bb-udhcpc or bb-udhcpc gets more conform with udhcpc > > what is this --env option supposed to do? >From what I see, this option results from a Gentoo patch to udhcpc. I found this in /lib/rcscripts/net/udhcpc.sh : [...] udhcpc_start() { [...] # Setup options for the udhcpc script # This requires a specfic Gentoo patch to udhcp which will not # be accepted upstream. if [[ " ${!d} " == *" nogateway "* ]] ; then opts="${opts} --env PEER_ROUTERS=no" else opts="${opts} --env PEER_ROUTERS=yes" fi [...] So this seems to be a "Gentoo made" problem, which should be solved inside of gentoo? Regards, Marc -- [EMAIL PROTECTED] mailing list
