This absolutely should be reported to [EMAIL PROTECTED] via https://bugs.gentoo.org
On Fri, 2008-01-18 at 05:05 +0100, Christopher Friedt wrote: > Hi, > > I was just wondering if I should submit a bug report for > sys-devel/gcc-4.1.2 on Gentoo's main bugzilla - > > it's exactly the same problem found here: > > http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=422971 > > and I've traced it to > > gcc-4.1.2-patches-1.0.2.tar.bz2/patch/62_all_gcc4-noteGNUstack.patch > > > Incorrect: > =================================================================== > --- libffi/src/arm/sysv.S.jj 2004-10-28 15:10:11.000000000 +0200 > +++ libffi/src/arm/sysv.S 2005-02-08 16:14:02.282767581 +0100 > @@ -207,3 +207,6 @@ LSYM(Lepilogue): > .ffi_call_SYSV_end: > .size > CNAME(ffi_call_SYSV),.ffi_call_SYSV_end-CNAME(ffi_call_SYSV) > > +#if defined __ELF__ && defined __linux__ > + .section .note.GNU-stack,"",@progbits > +#endif > =================================================================== > Correct: > =================================================================== > --- libffi/src/arm/sysv.S.jj 2004-10-28 15:10:11.000000000 +0200 > +++ libffi/src/arm/sysv.S 2005-02-08 16:14:02.282767581 +0100 > @@ -207,3 +207,6 @@ LSYM(Lepilogue): > .ffi_call_SYSV_end: > .size > CNAME(ffi_call_SYSV),.ffi_call_SYSV_end-CNAME(ffi_call_SYSV) > > +#if defined __ELF__ && defined __linux__ > + .section .note.GNU-stack,"",%progbits > +#endif > =================================================================== > > There are several similar patches in that file, and they all share the > same syntax, so I would imagine that all of the lines containing > > + .section .note.GNU-stack,"",@progbits > > are incorrect in the whole patch file, but I cannot confirm. > > ~/Chris -- [email protected] mailing list
