Hi Peter,

On Fri, 2008-03-14 at 16:09 +0100, Peter Stuge wrote:
> On Fri, Mar 14, 2008 at 09:59:40AM +0100, Marc Seil wrote:
> > The idea was to mount the target disk from the running target
> > platform (PC104) into the virtual environment.
> 
> Why?!
> 
> Maybe you would be better served by using catalyst to produce as many
> system images as you like in as many places as you like without
> needing to move a single disk around.
> 

I did not know the catalyst project so far. But I will give it a look.
Something I forgot to mention is, that the target pc104 systems do not
allow to boot from cdrom (not attached) or USB (only a dedicated USB
floppy drive). I still have to contact the manufacturer to get some
informations if a bios update could help in this case to boot from USB
(Pendrive or CDROM). 

Due to the fact that I can not boot from USB the idea to mount the
remote target filesystem seemed in my eyes a good alternative to limit
the interactions of attaching and detaching the ribbon cables,
especially during testing. 

Marc
 
> 
> //Peter

###########################################

This message has been scanned by F-Secure Anti-Virus for Microsoft Exchange.
For more information, connect to http://www.f-secure.com/
--
[email protected] mailing list

Reply via email to