On 11/17/08, Ahmed Ammar <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > On Mon, 2008-10-13 at 13:37 +0100, Martin Guy wrote: > > Where do you find "the openembedded ones"? I have looked for them but not > found. > > Do you know how to find them without setting up a whole OE build > environment? > > They used to have their repository available for online viewing but as > far as i can see it's been removed. Maybe too many people grabbing what > they wanted via http.
> > Of the two, 4.1.2 requires less memory to build it and to compile > > things, compiles things faster and seems to produce smaller faster > > code. oops, smaller, but not faster, though the difference is just a few % > The 4.2.4 patches that i was using as i said probably produced a broken > tool-chain so i moved back to 4.1.2 as you recommended. Yes, none of the others produced working executables as is. > I am pleased to hear that you are now being financed to continue where > others have left off as getting around certain bugs is very annoying > (broken unwind support) There is support called arm-crunch-unwind.patch in the later tarballs that is independent of the other patches and it should apply OK to the earlier GCC versions too. You can see it my most recent complete set under http://martinwguy.co.uk/martin/crunch/gcc-4.3.2-patches though this isn't prodution quality (sometimes Internal Compiler Errors) If you'd like to try adding that patch and running some tests with unwinds, I'd be glad to hear of your results . M
