On Thursday 02 May 2013 16:27:04 Joakim Tjernlund wrote:
> Note the KEYWORDS, installing pkgs using crossdev directly doesn't care
> about KEYWORDS
> but installing the same as binary pkgs respects KEYWORDS, a bit asymmetric
> but not a big deal

that's not really accurate.  crossdev sets up keywords in 
/etc/portage/package.keywords/ so that it uses versions that correspond to the 
target arch.  so if you're generating a cross-compiler for powerpc, you don't 
want to install a glibc version that has KEYWORDS=-ppc just because it also 
has KEYWORDS=amd64 (and your host system is amd64).

when installing the binpkgs, the /etc/portage/package.keywords/ setting isn't 
in place, so now you have to lie by using a hack like your ACCEPT_KEYWORDS.

> However this is somewhat confusing, I had to run
>  binutils-config powerpc-softfloat_4.5.3-linux-gnu-2.21.1
> manually after installing the binary pkgs, is that expected?

no, you shouldn't have to do that.  you can see the pkg_postinst for binutils:
toolchain-binutils_pkg_postinst() {
    # Make sure this ${CTARGET} has a binutils version selected
    [[ -e ${ROOT}/etc/env.d/binutils/config-${CTARGET} ]] && return 0
    binutils-config ${CTARGET}-${BVER}
}

your CTARGET should have been set to 'powerpc-softfloat_4.5.3-linux-gnu', and 
if you didn't have that target already installed on that system, things should 
have "just worked".

if you did already have a binutils installed for that target, then binutils-
config would have (rightfully) not been run.

> On a side note I can mention, installing a binary x86 binutils on a amd64
> host requires CHOST:
>   CHOST=i686-pc-linux-gnu binutils-config
> powerpc-softfloat_4.5.3-linux-gnu-2.21.1

trying to mix x86 & amd64 packages are known not to work.  no one is 
interested in supporting that today (ever?).

although, if this is the same setup as when you installed the binpkgs above, 
then that's probably why.

> Finally, running gdb yields:
>  # powerpc-softfloat_4.5.3-linux-gnu-gdb
> Python Exception <type 'exceptions.NameError'> name 'os' is not defined:

if this is the same binpkg as you described above (built for x86 but deployed 
to amd64), then this makes sense.  gdb has been configured against a 32bit 
python, but your host has only a 64bit python.
-mike

Attachment: signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part.

Reply via email to