On Sun, 6 Aug 2006, Mike Frysinger wrote: > On Sunday 06 August 2006 07:17, Peter S. Mazinger wrote: > > > > ssp may or may > > > > not be a good idea given how new the 4.x series is, but as Mike said, > > > > at least there's an eager upstream to fix any issues. > > > > toolchain.eclass misses the needed support for gcc-4.1 like ssp > > you cant just make statements like this without details ... > `gcc -fstack-protector` works just fine with gcc-4.1 > > i imagine you're referring to pie patchsets and split specs ? not only, toolchain.eclass (the ssp related functions) fail if someone tries to compile with a gcc that defaults to -pie -ssp (hardened profile)
Peter -- Peter S. Mazinger <ps dot m at gmx dot net> ID: 0xA5F059F2 Key fingerprint = 92A4 31E1 56BC 3D5A 2D08 BB6E C389 975E A5F0 59F2 -- [email protected] mailing list
