2017-05-02 18:02 GMT+02:00 Luis Ressel <ara...@aixah.de>: > On Tue, 2 May 2017 17:56:22 +0200 > Daniel Cegiełka <daniel.cegie...@gmail.com> wrote: > >> grep -r -e paxmark -e pax_kernel /usr/portage/ > > pax.?mark actually, since the eclass helper is called pax-mark. :) > I'd hold off on removing those for at least a few months, though. >
If PAX_MPROTECT returns (KSPP?), then ebuilds will need to be 'paxmarked' again. Years of work and PaX support ends in the trash. Now we see that there is a new level of security: user trust.
