>>>>> On Sun, 24 Jul 2011, Anthony G Basile wrote: > On 07/24/2011 01:45 PM, Mike Pagano wrote: >> Ulrich, thanks for thinking this through. I do like the #1, #2 >> combo, myself.
> I like the idea of dropping versioning altogether to avoid the > problems of upstream changing versioning again --- what happens when > 4.x comes out? But a quick grep of the tree shows atoms like this: > <virtual/linux-sources-2.5 > It may be more than just minor problems. Meanwhile ssuominen had committed virtual/linux-sources-3 which expectedly led to bug 376461. I've removed that ebuild again and, as a short-term solution, changed dependencies in linux-sources-2.6 to >=2.6. Ulrich
