On 26-01-2006 21:33:17 -0600, Kito wrote: > On Jan 26, 2006, at 2:22 AM, Grobian wrote: > > >On 25-01-2006 18:08:04 -0500, Nick Dimiduk wrote: > > > >>started putting together a .pkg (for my own uses) based on the most > >>recent portage-2.1 ebuild and it occurred to me that this may not be > >>appropriate. I'd be happy to clean it up for general distribution. > > > >Does 2.1 work properly on OSX? I have problems with 2.0.53 and up... > > Hmm? I think the problems you have are profile related, and not > portage. The prefix branch works fine all the way up to svn trunk.
Nope, it's related to the later portage tools dropping 'hardcoded support' for OSX, that's why I haven't keyworded the newer version, because it simply generates python stack traces for some tools (not emerge), which I don't consider to be "good". It was deliberately not fixed (sort of impossible), hence deliberately not keyworded by me. -- Fabian Groffen Gentoo for Mac OS X Project -- [email protected] mailing list
