-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- Hash: SHA1 If that is the concensus I'll probably fire off a quick message to -dev telling them and get vapier to touch up the docs a bit on make.conf syntax.
I don't see any reason myself why it shouldn't be 'a bash file' so to speak :) Paul Varner wrote: > On Thu, 2005-08-11 at 00:28 +0300, Marius Mauch wrote: > >>Paul Varner wrote: >> >>>My personal opinion is modify the tools to let portage handle it >>>utilizing portageq or equivalent. Here is a snippet of my code from >>>revdep-rebuild. If that is not possible, then I would state that the >>>file needs to be sourcable by bash. >> >>Not possible for euse as it needs not only the final USE but each part >>(global, profile, conf, env) separately. > > > Sounds like the answer then is that it needs to be a sourceable file :) > > Regards, > Paul -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.4.1 (GNU/Linux) Comment: Using GnuPG with Thunderbird - http://enigmail.mozdev.org iQIVAwUBQvrFuGzglR5RwbyYAQItYg//QeAOtgYqMtgc3Spj65VciYIxpfPt+X0t rMEu8vmqELGjNySIT6Khbj6ei8NrR1thyaKghHXqvX8mbLHuYg3d/fxc9musNRob TCdFtj6D1vslVxQv7s8NK/msf+wG+cc5iFBNwrkjjYLh7pZRFcoA5i2PN0WtWFCt IuAiIVgVFjZyNvYJiDES7wAPpTEOWU0pKrGdCMDbXVA1auwn8HgRLE1tTeM3Hnvc VkpvarfyZzJ7bCTBkZOFnzX4ppqHeJ3K953TrkEdXAMGk41nXHNDKIIv3yjwl5lr uTS29lrJDQcLhdH2QMlLrQ70/KXxscn+lWaCrrn6dcPhx17R2WL9RVH1La0qucCs XQ1dY8b4m3w7PPZ28CRNaSGjYJoMZUMFd/h4C/4WpetphdeiqX+35dyIjCysuor9 73/BnuTkzz4Zi2KyNkt3ne4Ukra2Ss6C8i1Eq+IiI0p+s+lLJZydS7mb6yZviK6d zsQJdv9O4rOae/ftCmRXctg8ewnUWxx6VTaekXQ5YqIl8TJI1r5KUBDjuQSYrj7X DWEuctqUWE0Q5eNUiLnVmmsTZhdrJjsXslKZZmVhkvVkDwt2uAwSv9NJpautvEu1 RTrkUbmo335HiBcrMzQF5EYnb0kiuUFu9Om8nZN1iYrGAYD+7q0D+o8plaBRyf4b 7okC55dOie4= =B+4C -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- -- [email protected] mailing list
